Texas declares open war on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube

Thank you for reading the news on technology: Texas declares open war on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube and now with the details

Cairo – Samia Sayed – Residents of the US state of Texas can now sue Facebook, Twitter and YouTube for alleged content censorship after a federal appeals court reinstated a state law banning censorship on social media platforms, allowing the state to enforce law while litigation continues, was reported aitnews.

The ruling that allows law enforcement, which was banned last year, has significant potential consequences. And it creates new legal risks for technology giants.

And it leaves them with a potential wave of lawsuits that legal experts say can be costly and difficult to defend.

Texas law prohibits any social media platform with 50 million U.S. users per month or more from blocking, removing, canceling, restricting, preventing or otherwise discriminating against expression.

The law creates confusion about how social media platforms work in Texas. It also raises questions about what users’ online spaces might look like and what content they might find there..

The decision allowed the state of Texas to declare an open war on technology platforms. It may reform the rights and obligations of all websites.

The Texas Attorney General or users can sue social media platforms that violate this prohibition and win an order and court costs, as required by law..

The idea of ​​the Texas law is centered on Republican criticism that technology platforms discriminate politically against conservative users, a charge denied by companies that platform moderation researchers say there is little systematic evidence to support..

The law was blocked by a district court judge in December and ruled unconstitutional under the First Amendment. This decision came months after a similar law was banned in Florida for the same reason.

But the situation changed this week, when a panel of three judges mingled between social media platforms and ISPs in oral arguments in the Court of Appeal..

The Court of Appeal reinstated Texas law

It was clear that the committee was struggling to understand basic technical concepts. That ruling prompted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to declare victory. He wrote on Twitter: “We have achieved another great victory against technology companies.

The Court of Appeal did not provide a written opinion explaining the decision, and technology advocacy groups that challenged the law were not given time to lodge an appeal..

Social networks in the United States have long relied on Article 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Section 230 has saved technology platforms from numerous lawsuits. But Texas law could change that. Constitutional law forces technology companies to fight the same lawsuits repeatedly.

It also prevents her from presenting a successful defense in one court as a way of pinching similar cases in other courts. One option for technology platforms is to stop all algorithmic content filtering or sorting completely.

Since algorithms can be blocked to remove material or reduce its visibility, social media platforms may have to offer pornography and hate speech because it will not be moderated..

However, it also cannot protect technological platforms against lawsuits. Thanks to the law’s loose language, the plaintiff could argue that Facebook silenced him because his posts were no longer visible due to the distribution of spam content..

Confronted with this, technology platforms can stop providing services in Texas. But even withdrawing from Texas can not save them.

There is a provision in the law prohibiting discrimination against Texans on the basis of their geographical location. And by moving out of Texas, technology companies can expose themselves to allegations that they discriminated against Texas in violation of the law..

There are two clear options for the groups that have challenged the law: to go directly to the Supreme Court, or to request a retrial before a broader panel of appellate judges in the hope of a different outcome, which could happen..

Classification of social media platforms as telephone companies

Another issue that could have far-reaching consequences is the law’s attempt to define social media platforms as public service companies similar to telephone companies..

Telephone companies are classified as public telecommunications companies and are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission. No such classification has been applied to websites, although there are arguments that digital platforms can be organized as common carriers.

By supporting this designation, states will provide a roadmap for platform regulation, with major implications for the broader digital economy.

And when the Texas law was enacted in September 2021, groups that support technology companies said the law could force social media platforms to offer false information and hate speech..

She also indicated that the law seeks to penalize social media platforms because they follow policies that protect their users from dangerous content.

Leave a Comment