Democracy is ours and they have | Ibrahim Al Zubaidi

It has been proven, proven and documented that elections in the “unbelieving” West under the leadership of America are immune. Neither governments nor the judiciary nor the citizen are in the process of dishonesty, manipulation and fraud. As for the elections we have in the land of the “believers”, only the strong, generous, owner of money, power, weapons and the foreign state behind him can win it.

Whoever lives in America or in one of the secular countries of Europe should have made sure that their voter is educated, free, loyal to his country and trustworthy in the interests of his people and country. It is very rare that he betrays trust . and gives his voice to those who do not deserve it.

As in our country and countries similar to ours, all elections, from beginning to end, are auctions and barter, and sometimes battles with arms, money, and government authority.

Of course, we are not talking here about countries whose president, king, guide, guardian jurist or one party decides in advance who is satisfied who is eligible to run in elections, who is the trusted voter who may vote, how many winners and how many losers, as is the case In Iran, Russia, China, Cuba and Venezuela.

Rather, we are only talking about democracy in Iraq, as it is the most telling example of political, cultural, religious and ideological divisions, and a perfect marriage between democracy and dictatorship.

What has happened in Iraq since the end of the last election in November last year, what is happening today, and what will continue to happen for months to come, is clear and resounding evidence of a lack of conscience and the death of patriotism and misconduct.

Neither the Tyrians are ready to give up their rewarding positions in power, nor are they able to break the will of the Sadrists and their Barzanite and Halbusi allies and take up sentences with what they behave without a partner did not, nor did Muqtada, Masoud and al-Halbousi. possess sufficient power to inflict the final defeat of their band opponents. Then neither this nor that understands democracy as it really is, and is committed to its morals and rules which would not exist without it.

The democracy established by US civilian ruler Paul Bremer and the reference and Iran in Iraq since the year of the US invasion of Iraq is the maximum that the state owns of parties owned by some old families in the feudal tribe become, allow and need polls to cover his dictatorship with its deceptive legitimacy, with the participation of the Puritan Salafi sectarian parties who believe that Democracy is heresy, and every heresy is on fire.

Regardless of the election results, there is no substitute for what they have recovered from. The presidency of the republic is part of the Kurdish house, the presidency of parliament is part of the Sunni house, and the presidency of the government and the general command of the armed forces are part of the Shiite house, then ministries and institutions are divided among the (enemies) partners, each according to its weight and size, and according to the external power of the state that sponsors and protects it.

The strange thing is that the leaders of America and its European allies who do not allow election fraud in their countries glorify the fraud of our elections, and then praise their integrity and the reliability of their results, even though their intelligence services know for sure that three-quarters of the winners, from 2005 to today, are fraudsters, extortionists, smugglers, slogan dealers and sellers of taboos Theft and drugs.

In our new democratic Iraq alone, the winner of the most parliamentary seats is prevented from forming a government, then the one with the fewest seats is appointed Prime Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, and he is allowed to have the ‘State money and the lives of his children according to his mood or the mood of his children, in-laws and party members, without any consideration of Parliament and the judiciary, then it remains, in spite of all that, in the eyes of America,’ a protector of democracy and it is necessary to support and protect it against every greedy and envious person, until he plays with his tail with it, and it drops him in the blink of an eye, and another alternative for him from his party bring, or from the “house” of his brothers in the sect After the approval of his ally Iran and the blessings of the Wali al-Faqih.

To the same extent that American and European leaders turn a blind eye to the destruction of our democracies, and encourage their mockery, empty themselves of their content and tamper with their rules and values, they stand up resolutely, fervently and firmly when one of their democracies is exposed to the slightest prejudice against it or its owners.

When Russian Tsar Putin sent his armies to Ukraine to assassinate his elected president or his family and install a Ukrainian government according to his mood and specifications, he was surprised by thirty western and eastern countries, led by America, which rushed to help. of suffering humanity in Ukraine, and to defend the dignity, freedom and sacred rights of the Ukrainian people.

But America itself, and with it the thirty countries that revolted against sin and aggression in Ukraine, did not find in all of Putin’s massacres in Syria, nor in the crimes of the Jewish settlers in Palestine, what more than silence, complacency and acceptance do not deserve.

Take, for example, Saddam Hussein. He remained a good friend of America and its European and Arab allies for decades, until he split the stick of obedience, sang for his fall, and sang about Palestine.

Then I suspended Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, who was also elected, put him in jail, tried him and made him suffer the worst forms of humiliation. The same situation was repeated with Tunisian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, Muammar Gaddafi, the Brotherhood of Egypt, Nahda Ghannouchi, and the rope to the tractor.

The last concerts of orchestrated eviction wrapped in democracy and parliamentary legitimacy have recently taken place in Pakistan.

Pakistani Prime Minister (Elected) Imran Khan received a short message from his ambassador in Washington from a senior US official saying: “Pakistan will be pardoned if Imran Khan leaves, otherwise there will be consequences.”

Then America left it, very quickly, with the voices of its friends and allies in Parliament. The ousted Pakistani president attributed the reasons that made America angry with him and decided to deport him to his alliance with and armament of China, his visit to his friend Vladimir Putin and his agreement with him, and then the slogan “Pakistan is not for sale. ” “

Leave a Comment