How does America manage the clash of civilizations using movies? | opinions

How does Hollywood achieve US foreign policy goals? And how can we discover this by analyzing her films on American policy towards the Islamic world?

Films produced by Hollywood depicting Arabs and Muslims are very important to be read in light of America’s goals of enforcing its political and economic control over Muslim countries.

The in-depth critical analysis of American films also shows that they feed the anti-Islamic sentiments of the American people and Islamic countries, in order to gain popular support for the decisions of American foreign policymakers to launch aggression against Islamic countries, enforce control over these countries, restoring the traditional colonial logic based on the occupation of countries, and governing Governments in these countries are by their subordinates forcing their people to accept America’s exploitation of its wealth.

The film also justifies the actions of the American intelligence services, and glorifies the elements of these services; Following the attack on the residential complex in Riyadh, a team of 4 FBI agents traveled to Riyadh to investigate the incident, to investigate and track down the criminals, and to bring justice to the American citizens who died in the incident. .

The movie “The Kingdom” is a model

This approach can help increase our understanding of many films such as “Rules of Engagement” in 2000 and “The Kingdom” in 2007. Researcher Obeida Menshawi Fawal analyzed these two films – in his Master’s degree from Concordia University, Canada in 2013 – and explains how Hollywood is producing a stereotypical image of Islam and Muslims, and that this image falls within the framework of American politics and agenda, and that the US government used these films – which it showed on American television screens – to Islam as a threat to America, and to pressure the Americans to support the aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq.

The movie “The Kingdom” is an important model for America’s use of films to achieve its political goals, as it is based on an actual incident that took place in a residential complex in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and that incident was a car explosion that killed a number of people, including U.S. citizens.

Spread fear among Americans

The film was used to create an atmosphere of fear for Muslims in the United States, and to perpetuate the stereotypical images of Muslims produced by Orientalist discourse.

The film also justifies the actions taken by the US intelligence services, and glorifies the elements of these devices. After the attack on the residential complex in Riyadh, a team of 4 FBI agents travels to Riyadh to investigate, investigate and investigate the incident. discuss. to track down criminals, and to bring justice to the American citizens who died in the crash.

But the Saudi authorities are hampering the team’s work; This limited the duration of his stay to only 5 days, and limited his range of motion, under the pretext of maintaining his safety.

The victory of the good Americans

However, Ronald Fleury and his team manage to embark on a dangerous mission with the help of an English-speaking Saudi officer named Al-Ghazi, who appears largely estranged as he mediates between the team and the Saudi authorities around the team. to facilitate their work, and not to be bound by religious traditions.

But a terrorist group manages to kidnap a member of the team (Levit), and the story unfolds, so the team tracks down the kidnappers, to try to save Levitt, and a shootout takes place in which the American team ( the good guys) defeat the bad terrorists, and are able to reveal the mastermind of the attack on the Al-Sakani complex, an elderly man named Abu Hamza, and his young grandson following in the footsteps of his grandfather , who eventually dies, but after becoming the Saudi officer (Al-Ghazi) who helps the team.

The narrator’s voice still describes the rich Saudis who spend money because they do not know its value, so they need the Americans to ensure their safety, and to help them exploit their oil. The voice of an American woman says that Islamic laws are applied outside the headquarters of the American forces and American residential complexes.

eternal enmity with the West

There is a very clear connotation in this film, as Saudi Arabia is portrayed as a primitive country, a country that is a symbol of Islam and Muslims as opposed to the modern advanced West.

The director uses the narrator’s voice to review the history of the Kingdom; “It was formed with the help of Wahhabi Islamic warriors who are hostile to the West, and who want to return to true Islam,” he said. This paragraph, presented by the narrator, aims to portray true Islam as fundamentalist, and in a state of permanent hostility to the West. The narrator’s voice is accompanied by an image of the vast open desert inhabited by camels and men riding horses and fighting with swords.

The narrator’s voice comes again to explain how oil was accidentally discovered in the Kingdom during the search for water. Since that date – as the narrator says – the Saudis have wanted the Americans to stay in their country to maintain their security.

Kingdom Movie (social networking sites)

Trump uses the same terms!

Then the narrator’s voice goes on to describe the rich Saudis who spend money; Because they do not know their value, they need the Americans to ensure their safety, and to help them exploit their oil. The voice of an American woman says that Islamic laws are applied outside the headquarters of the American forces and American residential complexes, and are not applied within them, and that there is a difference in culture between Americans and Saudis.

He notes that in his speech, Trump used concepts and terms echoed by this film, such as America’s role in maintaining the security of the Kingdom, and that the Saudis are the ones who want the American presence in their country, and note the connection between the characteristics used since World War II about the rich Arabs – who do not They understand the value of money – and new characteristics such as terrorism.

Western arrogance

He also notes that the film feeds the complex of Western superiority and superiority.The Arabs are not as capable as the Americans.There is a big difference between modern Western Christian culture and the old backward Islamic traditions; In the American housing complex, Americans play sports with their children and wives, and are happy, then the camera moves to Washington, where Fleurie asks about his son at his school, and prepares for his son’s birthday. Thus, the film offers the peaceful environment suitable for life in America, which is only threatened by terrorism that uses suicide operations and the terrorist who shouts “God is great” and kills innocent people.

The film thus presents Islam as the enemy of the advanced, peaceful and secure life in America, and as the enemy of modern Western civilization.

Evil and misery

The film also portrays Muslims as evil terrorists living in misery; Therefore, they deserve no sympathy, while Americans are portrayed as the innocent victims who lose their lives because of their belief in a sinister, cunning Muslim who does not care about crying children.

The film tries to evoke the feelings of the American people by depicting the bodies of Americans lying on the ground, while a Saudi man forces his son to see the bodies of the dead Americans.

proper comparison

American movies always force the viewer to compare – as in the movie The Kingdom – between the American portrayed as an exemplary father who loves and embraces his son, talks calmly to him and protects him from seeing bad news, and the Arab Muslim. portrayed with cruelty, and that he does not care about human life.

American films also complicate comparisons between places and people, forcing viewers to sympathize with the good American who leads an advanced life, as opposed to the harsh Arab Muslim who lives in a desert environment, is incompetent, and willing have the American must protect him. and at the same time, these Arab Muslim acts of terror are committing a suicide bombing in which innocent Americans are killed.

Forcing viewers to hate Muslims

This portrays the contradiction and distinction between the backward Arab Muslim and the good and advanced American, and of course the viewer must support America, no matter what massacres it has committed against Muslims. Hollywood simplifies contrasting images and forces viewers to hate and fear Muslims, who are always the bad guy.

It forms an extension of the colonial heritage and Western ideology based on the division and distinction between the good advanced Christian West and the bad Islamic East.

Justified and rational violence

The terrorism perpetrated by Muslims in Hollywood films is interpreted as the result of irrational religious radicalism. At the same time, Hollywood portrays the violence perpetrated by Americans against Muslims as justified and rational, and its purpose is to arrest criminals. take, and that Americans work. to achieve justice and maintain security.

Fleuri says in the movie The Kingdom: Terrorist killers like “Abu Hamza” plan to spread violence, organize it and brainwash people who commit criminal acts, and these are the men we are fighting against.

Hollywood has always portrayed the American warrior as brave and heroic, protecting the safety of Americans from Muslim-religious fanatics who kill innocents.

In the last scene, American violence is justified as it is carried out against terrorists who raise children and train them to become terrorists, thus justifying and legalizing the killing of Muslim children.

American violence is self-defense

Hollywood has also portrayed Islamic violence as the result of racial hatred, while American violence is a process of self-defense and justice.

All the Americans have done is to kill “Abu Hamza” who wants to be like Osama bin Laden, and his grandson who is preparing him to play this role, and this gives the viewer the impression that all Muslims are terrorists of grandfather to grandson.

This is the last message that must remain in the viewer’s mind, and he must believe that the war between Islam and the West has been stretched and that the world is living in a clash of civilizations.

Leave a Comment