. Nawal Al-Saadawi says: “The man breaks the girl’s legs, then carries her on his back and walks and complains about …

The feminist movement in Jordan

.
Nawal Al-Saadawi says: “The man breaks the girl’s legs, then carries her on his back and walks and complains about the burden and responsibility.”

Men usually receive messages telling them that they are the breadwinner in different emotional relationships and that they need to be strong and independent, while women receive messages that teach them to avoid conflicts and represent the needs of others, and when it when it comes to money, they teach the man how to earn it and the woman how to spend it, and when the two grow up, the woman finds that she herself faces a wage gap between men and women, in addition to being very free works such as cleaning, teaching, educating and caring.

Everyone loves money and no one can deny it, but why is the accusation of “love of money” attached to women?

Let’s think about the answer, a woman may marry a man who does not suit her to get money to spend, but the man also does it either to get money or to get a job that suits him offers more money, and in both cases the person with whom they are related, the means and money are the purpose, and in both cases the love of money also controls People of different sexes, but their personal nature is what determines whether they will do or not

On the other hand, we must pay attention to the fact that money does not have the same meaning for both parties, as a study was done among more than a hundred thousand people from both sides to try to understand how they analyze money and what seduces them. As for women, money means love and affection for them, and the more they spend money on themselves, the more they feel love for themselves and those around them.

The feminization of poverty is another motive for women’s pursuit of economic security when they choose a man in societies who has forced unpaid work on women who take their time and effort to secure their material needs on their own and obstacles for their financial independence.
The feminization of poverty is a feminist term that signifies the phenomenon of a high rate and severity of poverty among women compared to men, due to unequal opportunities for education, employment, asset ownership and inheritance, as well as women’s obsession with unpaid roles (motherhood) and family care), and in return men work in paid positions. This led to the concentration of money in the hands of men, as opposed to the poverty of women

Stories are all around us, however, full of men who married widows, divorced women and elderly women out of greed for their inheritance, in addition to stealing their wives’ inheritance shares and their salaries!
Men also do not blame their constant search for beauty in their partners, while they blame women’s search for money in their partners

Written by: @ emy.dawud and a feminist page

.
Nawal Al-Saadawi says: “The man breaks the girl’s legs, then carries her on his back and walks and complains about the burden and responsibility.”

Men usually receive messages telling them that they are the breadwinner in different emotional relationships and that they need to be strong and independent, while women receive messages that teach them to avoid conflicts and represent the needs of others, and when it when it comes to money, they teach the man how to earn it and the woman how to spend it, and when the two grow up, the woman finds that she herself faces a wage gap between men and women, in addition to being very free works such as cleaning, teaching, educating and caring.

Everyone loves money and no one can deny it, but why is the accusation of “love of money” attached to women?

Let’s think about the answer, a woman may marry a man who does not suit her to get money to spend, but the man also does it either to get money or to get a job that suits him offers more money, and in both cases the person with whom they are related, the means and money are the purpose, and in both cases the love of money also controls People of different sexes, but their personal nature is what determines whether they will do or not

On the other hand, we must pay attention to the fact that money does not have the same meaning for both parties, as a study was done among more than a hundred thousand people from both sides to try to understand how they analyze money and what seduces them. As for women, money means love and affection for them, and the more they spend money on themselves, the more they feel love for themselves and those around them.

The feminization of poverty is another motive for women’s pursuit of economic security when they choose a man in societies who has forced unpaid work on women who take their time and effort to secure their material needs on their own and obstacles for their financial independence.
The feminization of poverty is a feminist term that signifies the phenomenon of a high rate and severity of poverty among women compared to men, due to unequal opportunities for education, employment, asset ownership and inheritance, as well as women’s obsession with unpaid roles (motherhood) and family care), and in return men work in paid positions. This led to the concentration of money in the hands of men, as opposed to the poverty of women

Stories are all around us, however, full of men who married widows, divorced women and elderly women out of greed for their inheritance, in addition to stealing their wives’ inheritance shares and their salaries!
Men also do not blame their constant search for beauty in their partners, while they blame women’s search for money in their partners

Written by: @ emy.dawud and a feminist page

A photo posted by The Feminist Movement in Jordan (@ feminist.movement.jo) on

The feminist movement in Jordan

Leave a Comment