Monday 11 July 2022 05:52
Many hope they will gain admiration by sharing selfies on social media, but the biggest fans of their photos, according to an Australian survey, are the technology companies that use them to train their artificial intelligence systems, such as sharing “selfies” can reveal more personal information, which even “face recognition” technology does, according to the Emirati statement.
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation quoted a report by the Australian consumer advocacy group “Choice” that major retail companies in Australia, “Key Mart”, “Bonings” and “The Good Guys” use face recognition technology to capture important data. some of its stores, with Bonnings stating that it is used to “identify persons of interest who have previously been involved in incidents of concern in our stores”.
As part of its survey, Choice asked more than 1,000 people what they think of the technology, 65% of whom said it was worrying, and some described it as “scary and too much.” In considering the decisions people make every day by willingly giving away their personal data and photos, The Choice survey showed that sharing selfies on social media with a live streaming service or “loyalty card” reveals more personal information as face recognition technology.
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported that although the giant Meta company that owns Facebook and Instagram stopped using the technology last year, that does not mean that our various images were not harvested by the companies that create bases. Searchable data for faces. While this may be news to many people unfamiliar and may lead some of them to delete their accounts, most people will not.
“Algorithms will interpret those images and use those results to better identify who is trapped in the surveillance images,” Dennis B. Desmond, a cyber intelligence expert at the University of the Sunshine Coast and a former FBI agent, told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation said “It does not matter if the photos are high quality or low quality,” he added. Bad or vague images are also useful for training the algorithm, he says, because surveillance images are not always complete, front-view, clear or accurate, and note that many people do not understand what can be obtained in return for giving. . increases a certain level of privacy.
In Osaka, Japan uses face recognition technology at some train stations to let people go through revolving gates without taking out their travel card. Retailers rely on reducing shoplifting and notifying them if someone has stolen from the store before re-entering. They are also used by law enforcement agencies to disrupt serious and violent crimes as well as identity theft.
But sentiments about this technology, which emerged in the United States in the 1960s, are unlikely to change until there is more transparency, according to the agency. While people can limit online stored data in some way by changing their cookie preferences. Other than wearing a costume, they cannot withdraw or withdraw face recognition when used in settings such as retail stores. There is no right to personal privacy in many countries, and there are no laws dedicated to how data obtained through face recognition is used.
University of South Australia law professor Sarah Molds emphasizes to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation the need to clarify three key elements: consent, quality and use of a third party. If people do not agree to the monitoring, if they can not trust that the visibility is of high quality, and if they do not know with whom their data is shared, they have the right to worry. High quality imaging is especially important for reducing racial prejudice, as technology is more accurate at identifying white men. For this reason, the Australian Human Rights Commission has warned against the use of facial recognition images in “extremely dangerous circumstances”.
“You should not rely on this technology when it comes to things like proving someone’s innocence or determining someone’s refugee status or something,” Molds said.
For many people, things get even more complicated when this biometric information is combined with other data such as financial or health records. Experts say that anyone can deduce things like, “how much they earn, what their training is, and what they will get over the weekend. It can also help companies make decisions to give him credit, insurance or work, and the list goes on.”
But the truth is that this type of data is already available, according to the agency, through our online activities that have been harvested and sold over a period of years.
Desmond, however, noted that lawmakers need to take a more proactive approach to regulating facial recognition, saying: “I believe there is an urgent need for more government regulation and oversight of technologies used in the commercial sector when it comes to individuals’ privacy and rights include. ” He added, “As it turns out, neither the government nor the private sector has a very good record so far to protect our data from abuse.”
Molds argued that stricter laws are also needed if we are to protect vulnerable people from the potential abuse of AI.
Source: Technology: Does the sharing of selfies cause data disclosure?