Double Legal Strikes Beat Trump – Yalla Match

Tight network of investigation

Both developments appeared to widen Trump’s potential legal exposure, which now features sharply in at least three separate dramas that include an investigation into Georgia in his alleged bid to steal the 2020 election in the critical swing state. The former president has denied any wrongdoing in all respects.

But the deepening crisis for Trump also came on the day the January 6, 2021 House Select Committee on the Insurgency officially announced its first fall session next week. The committee has not yet decided whether criminal proceedings against the ex-pres. The Justice Department already has a separate grand jury investigation into the events surrounding his false allegations of election fraud and those that led to the attack on the US Capitol by a mob of supporters.

And the bleak legal storm for Trump heightens the unusual prospect of a former president facing possible criminal proceedings and serious civil penalties that could significantly threaten his fortune. Much of Trump’s initial political appeal rested on the idea that he was a highly successful businessman who had built a highly profitable business and amassed a personal fortune. If the whole thing turns out to be a hoax and his career is a house of cards built on illegal acts, his narrative will take a serious hit – though it probably won’t be enough to shake his appeal to its core ingredients.

Trump’s latest legal rebuke comes as he considers a possible 2024 presidential campaign, which he has already indicated will build on his claim of political persecution by Democrats, and he has already tacitly warned of violence if he is formally indicted.

“The art of stealing?”

New York State’s civil lawsuit against Trump represents the largest catalog to date of the former president’s business practices and also targets three of his grown sons – Don Jr, Ivanka and Eric, who are deeply involved in the Trump Organization.

It alleges an astonishing pattern of property and asset overvaluation across Trump’s real estate portfolio, hotel and golf club empire. The alleged purpose of the multiple schemes was to deceive lenders, insurance brokers and tax authorities into giving him better loan terms and lowering his tax liability. James claimed that every testimony was personally signed by Trump and that he played a direct role in falsifying the assessments. In one instance in his claim, James said Trump inflated the size of his Trump Tower apartment from less than 11,000 square feet to more than 30,000 square feet to the tune of $327 million. In another case, she alleged that Trump repeatedly exaggerated the value of an office building owned by the organization at 40 Wall Street.

What do you know about the civil fraud lawsuit facing Donald Trump and his family in New York

“It’s a massive complaint, it’s a strong complaint, it’s full of facts and it’s very serious. And so Donald Trump and others named in the complaint will spend their day in court responding to this and trying to find out, Jeffrey Berman, the former US attorney general for the Southern District of New York, told CNN- reporter Erin Burnett said.

“It’s massive.”

James said that any ordinary citizen who allegedly committed such acts would be given the book. Not pursuing the case, she said, means there are two legal systems, one for workers and one for the rich and powerful.

“There can be no different rules for different people in this country or this state,” James said.

Her comments were aimed directly at the idea behind Trump’s entire political narrative — that he is an outsider fighting for ordinary Americans against a regime that favors elites.

“corporate capital punishment”

At the very least, the sanctions James is seeking against Trump in a potentially lengthy case are likely to severely limit the company’s ability to operate, particularly in the U.S. financial capital.

“She’s seeking what corporate lawyers call the death penalty, which would be the equivalent of revoking the Trump Organization’s license so they can’t even do business in New York anymore,” CNN legal analyst Paul Callan told Anderson Cooper .

“It’s a very serious punishment if AG wins the lawsuit.”

In a sign that Trump’s defense could be a daunting task, James said he repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. In a civil case, and not a criminal one, prosecutors have the right to assign a negative conclusion to such a step.

Strange day for Trump, borrow money and you

James, a Democrat, went out of her way to insist that there was no political motive behind her case and that other companies have faced similar criticism.

But James opened up some opportunities for Trump to accuse her of political bias. Before her reign, she publicly said she believed the then president could be impeached. And the ludicrous use of the Trump slogan in her presentation unveiling the lawsuit looked somewhat like a victory. “Demanding money you don’t have is not up to the ‘art of the deal’,” she said. “This is the art of stealing.”

Trump quickly responded to the lawsuit by calling it a witch hunt — his time-honored tactic of dismissing any attempt to force him to face impeachment. Trump may try to argue that his business adopted the same business practices as others in New York and that he is being unfairly singled out as a former president and potential future candidate.

However, evidence revealed in the lawsuit could expand in unexpected directions to other jurisdictions — even if it doesn’t result in a criminal case against the Trump Organization — potentially threatening the company’s financial viability.

Another blow in the case of confidential documents

The Justice Department’s victory in the 11th Circuit represents another legal blow to Trump as it targets the notion that he is immune from rules on classified information.

Not only did the appeals court partially delay a lower court ruling to stop the Justice Department’s review of 100 classified documents from Mar-a-Lago, which officials say are government property and could expose U.S. intelligence sources and methods and even involve classified U.S. assets endanger abroad. The ruling also dismissed Trump’s legal team’s argument that the former president may have declassified documents as president.

Appeals court says Justice Department can appeal criminal investigation into classified Mar-a-Lago documents

The ruling said that “the report contains no evidence that any of these records have been declassified. And before the special master, the plaintiff resisted providing any evidence that he had declassified any of these documents,” he said, referring to a third-party official appointed by a lower official. Court to browse the documents taken during the search.

Nick Ackerman, a former assistant US attorney for the Southern District of New York, said on CNN on Wednesday that the Eleventh Circuit had dismissed Trump’s case and expressed doubt that the Supreme Court would consider the case if it got that far.

He said: “Donald Trump had no proper interest in the classified documents, and there is no way for him to have the right to obtain this information or to have access to this information. That is the basis for this whole view.”

political repercussions

As usual, when Trump faces a legal threat, the question arises as to whether he will face a political price.

For years, the former president tried to discredit any institution, including the courts, that took over his duties. He criticized them as biased, corrupt and a tool of liberal oppression. He also specifically targeted James, accusing her of racism against him. This demagoguery is now a crucial tool for his political brand. At rallies, he told his supporters that he was ready to prosecute to protect them.

There is little chance that the former president’s base will turn against him. However, more damaging allegations of Trump’s behavior are unlikely to help his already declining standing with general election voters who voted to impeach him in 2020. Only the pressure of another serious legal threat can weigh him down as he thinks about something else. Run the White House.

However, the fact that current presidents are protected from criminal proceedings may now seem more attractive to Trump. And if he does not run in 2024, it will be difficult for the former president to claim that he is a political victim.

Leave a Comment