Al Quds newspaper

Tuesday 27 September 2022 10:43Jerusalem time

Written by: Rasem Obeidat
I am almost certain that all the tragedies, forced migration, homelessness and catastrophes that have befallen our Palestinian people are the result of colonial Britain, whose Foreign Secretary Balfour made a promise to the Jewish billionaire Rothschild on November 2, 1917 to create a national home for the Jews in Palestine at the expense of the Palestinian people and their land, and this Giving of those who have not to those who do not deserve it was not spontaneous or without colonial planning, vision and strategy. one of its colonial goals, that this entity is located in the heart of the Arab world, separates its north from its south, and prevents any unification process in the future and the establishment of any Arab national project. And the control of the Arabs over their wealth and wealth, as well as a strategic mission for this entity, to be the spearhead of the colonial countries, in the suppression and attack of any Arab country or liberation movement, which is an exit from the forces of colonialism and liberation from their imagination, and within this vision Britain worked to facilitate Jewish immigration to Palestine as well as to supply this entity with weapons, in order to ensure the expansion of the Zionist project over the entire Palestinian geography.. .and Britain used the harshest punishments against the Palestinian resistance, so that the possession of one bullet was enough to sentence death or permanent imprisonment. It must belong to its owner, … because of Britain’s colonial policy and the complicity of what was known as the Arab Salvation Army, which has no part of the rescue except the name, since most of them led was by the leaders of the British colonial army, and their weapons were corrupt and their preparations for war were verbal, verbal and slogans, and in fact most of them coincided with colonial and occupational project. Britain is the one that supported the entity state, and has always been by its side, supporting it with all the elements of strength and survival militarily, financially, economically and politically, and viewing the struggle and resistance of our people as a form of “terrorism” and that the entity state has the right to defend itself in the face of “terror.” Palestinian and Arab terrorism…. Within this vision we found that successive British governments stood up and failed to take any decisions or sanctions that were proposed or sought to be adopted in international institutions by the UN Security Council, the General Assembly and the United Nations Human Rights Council to be imposed on the entity state for its establishment By committing crimes against our Palestinian people, and practicing racism and all forms of ethnic cleansing against them, and even went further by amending its laws, to allow the arrest and trial of any of the soldiers and leaders of the occupation accused of committing war crimes on its lands, as well as criminalizing those who call for a boycott of the entity state and its institutions. As a result of its racist policies , as well as all those who call for the withdrawal of investments from it, and the international boycott movement (BDS) as an illegal organization considered… and it was not satisfied with it, but it classified many Palestinian organizations with its military and political wings, such as Hamas and Al-Jah Islamic Ed and the Popular Front as “terrorist” organizations, as well as a large part of the policy of the European Union, which insists on providing conditional money to Palestinian NGOs and civil organizations, since these institutions must sign an annex in the financing contracts, agreed to consider many expressions As well as the necessity to the beneficiaries of verify these funds.

Britain, with the passage of more than a century since the Balfour Declaration, has refused to apologize for this ominous promise, even on the centenary of its anniversary, as our Palestinian people and its political forces demanded that it ‘ offer an apology to the Palestinians. people, and accepts his political, legal, moral and material responsibilities for this unjust promise. But she refused it and held a celebration on the centenary of this promise, insisting on denying the rights of our people, our cause and our national rights, and what her disgusting talk that she was a solution based on the supporting two states is nothing more than throwing ashes in the eyes.

Britain and other countries of the colonial West and America, who say that they are opposed to the permissibility of seizing the land of others by force, as is the case in the Ukraine, where they are waging their war with America against Russia in the Ukraine described, that Russia has no right to invade another country and occupy its land, and they know very well that The military operation carried out by Russia is necessary to protect its national security, to preventing NATO from reaching the “bedrooms” of the Russian leadership, as well as including Ukraine in NATO and the deployment of strategic weapons on its territory that threaten Russia’s national security.

These double standards and selective policies, we see clearly in the discussions taking place in the United Nations General Assembly at its 77th session, as America and Britain will be among the first countries to begin to oppose any resolution voted on in the United Nations Security Council, after getting nine votes and accepting the right to recognize his right to a Palestinian state under occupation.

Britain has its new right-wing prime minister, Lisa Terrace, who, when she was foreign secretary in Boris Johnson’s government, promised her friends from the Jewish lobby to move her country’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, similar to America, which led during the era of former US President Trump, the process of moving its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem on the anniversary of the Nakba of our Palestinian people May 15, 2018, followed by three other countries, Guatemala, Honduras and Kosovo. ..Britain is hostile and denies human rights Our people and the protector of the occupying state, together with the powers of the colonial West and America, from any decisions or punishments that may be taken against them or imposed on them as a result of their flagrant violation of the law and international treaties and agreements. Among these, many of them mourned… In a strange Western paradox, those countries did not lower their flags or declare mourning over the death or martyrdom of many Arab and Palestinian leaders.

Here is Britain, where you flocked to attend her funeral, slapped you in the face and told you that it will only side with the entity state in its occupation and violation of international law.

Leave a Comment